<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave invitations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radu.cotescu.com/2009/12/01/google-wave-invitations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radu.cotescu.com/2009/12/01/google-wave-invitations/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Florin</title>
		<link>http://radu.cotescu.com/2009/12/01/google-wave-invitations/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Florin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radu.cotescu.com/?p=1027#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on wave? 

I looked at it, it&#039;s great, as a software product. But I can&#039;t really say I see its usefulness in that many cases, therefore I&#039;d like to hear other people&#039;s opinions too.

It&#039;s great if your company&#039;s way of working adapts to it, otherwise all its features are useless, IMO.

More precisely, you can  replace face to face meetings with it, and even gain something from that, since all that&#039;s being said remains written, but if your bosses, marketing ppl and so on simply refuse to use it, you&#039;re stuck with face to face meetings.

Also, unless you really go about and start editing a document in a team of three, its wonderous sync features don&#039;t really get to shine.

The biggest benefit I see is that it could unify wikis, chat rooms, forums and lots of other systems typically/often used by companies. But in order to really be useful, these companies have to adapt their working styles to wave. In the real world, many companies still regard forums as useless and block chat protocols. Some don&#039;t even know what a wiki is, and if they did, they&#039;d be scared to death by the idea of some newbie editing a boss&#039;s contribution.

Anybody got something to say about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on wave? </p>
<p>I looked at it, it&#8217;s great, as a software product. But I can&#8217;t really say I see its usefulness in that many cases, therefore I&#8217;d like to hear other people&#8217;s opinions too.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great if your company&#8217;s way of working adapts to it, otherwise all its features are useless, IMO.</p>
<p>More precisely, you can  replace face to face meetings with it, and even gain something from that, since all that&#8217;s being said remains written, but if your bosses, marketing ppl and so on simply refuse to use it, you&#8217;re stuck with face to face meetings.</p>
<p>Also, unless you really go about and start editing a document in a team of three, its wonderous sync features don&#8217;t really get to shine.</p>
<p>The biggest benefit I see is that it could unify wikis, chat rooms, forums and lots of other systems typically/often used by companies. But in order to really be useful, these companies have to adapt their working styles to wave. In the real world, many companies still regard forums as useless and block chat protocols. Some don&#8217;t even know what a wiki is, and if they did, they&#8217;d be scared to death by the idea of some newbie editing a boss&#8217;s contribution.</p>
<p>Anybody got something to say about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihai</title>
		<link>http://radu.cotescu.com/2009/12/01/google-wave-invitations/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radu.cotescu.com/?p=1027#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>One for me please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One for me please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Quirola</title>
		<link>http://radu.cotescu.com/2009/12/01/google-wave-invitations/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Quirola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radu.cotescu.com/?p=1027#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve really looked into this google wave business and i really wanted to try it out. 

I&#039;m always on the computer chatting with my friends i would love the new experience 

if you could please send me a invite at [&lt;strong&gt;email removed&lt;/strong&gt;]...
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve really looked into this google wave business and i really wanted to try it out. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m always on the computer chatting with my friends i would love the new experience </p>
<p>if you could please send me a invite at [<strong>email removed</strong>]&#8230;<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk (user agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Object Caching 335/338 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via static.cotescu.com

Served from: radu.cotescu.com @ 2010-09-09 20:52:19 -->